Developing a HACCP Plan: Fundamental Steps

Ensuring food safety is an indisputable priority in the food industry. Implementing a HACCP (Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) system is essential to achieve this goal. This article provides a detailed, step-by-step guide to developing an effective HACCP plan, intertwining theory with practical examples, and focusing on the implementation of good hygiene practices as prerequisite programs.

Principle 1: Conduct a Hazard Analysis

Identify potential hazards (biological, chemical, or physical) associated with each stage of the food process. This analysis is the foundation upon which the entire HACCP plan is built and requires a detailed and systematic approach.

Methodology for Hazard Analysis:

1. Review of Ingredients and Raw Materials:

   • Examine each ingredient or raw material used in the food process.
   • Identify possible contaminants or inherent hazards (like bacteria in raw meat or toxins in fish).

2. Evaluation of the Production Process:

   • Analyze each step of the process, from receipt to packaging and distribution.
   • Consider how each operation (cutting, cooking, cooling, etc.) can introduce or control hazards.

3. Identification of Potential Hazards:

   • Identify biological hazards (such as bacteria, viruses, parasites), chemical hazards (such as pesticide residues, contaminants, food additives), and physical hazards (like metal, glass, or plastic fragments).
   • Consider factors such as the likelihood of occurrence and the severity of the impact on health.

4. Evaluation of the Final Product and Intended Use:

   • Determine how the product is consumed and who the consumers are (vulnerable populations like children or the elderly may be at greater risk).
   • Analyze storage and handling conditions after production.

5. Documentation and Review of the Analysis:

   • Document each identified hazard and the decisions made during the analysis.
   • Regularly review and update the hazard analysis to reflect changes in the process, ingredients, or legislation.

• Practical Example: Hazard Analysis in a Juice Factory:
  1. Reception of Fruits:
     • Biological Hazard: Contamination by pathogens on the surface of the fruits.
     • Chemical Hazard: Pesticide residues in fruits.
  2. Juice Extraction:
     • Physical Hazard: Possibility of seed or stem fragments in the juice.
  3. Pasteurization:
     • Control of Biological Hazards: Using heat to eliminate pathogens.
  4. Packaging:
     • Physical Hazard: Risk of contamination from packaging materials.
  5. Storage and Distribution:
     • Biological Hazard: Growth of microorganisms if the temperature is not adequately controlled.

This detailed approach ensures that all potential hazards are identified and controlled, guaranteeing the safety of the final food product.

Principle 2: Identify Critical Control Points (CCPs)

Determine points in the process where identified hazards can be prevented, eliminated, or reduced to safe levels. CCPs are essential stages where control can be applied to ensure product safety.

Methodology for Identifying CCPs:

1. Use of CCP Decision Tree:

   • Use a CCP Decision Tree, a systematic tool to evaluate each step identified in the hazard analysis and determine if it is a CCP.
   • Consider whether a hazard can be prevented, eliminated, or reduced to safe levels at each step.

2. Evaluation of Each Process Step:

   • Examine each step of the process (like material reception, processing, storage, etc.) in detail.
   • Ask whether a hazard exists and, if so, whether it can be controlled at that point.

3. Determination Based on Knowledge and Data:

   • Base the identification of CCPs on technical knowledge and scientific data, such as microbial growth studies, thermal process models, and others.
   • Consider the company’s and industry’s experience and historical records.

4. Consult with Experts:

   • Include in the HACCP team people with technical and practical experience in the process.
   • Consider consulting with external experts for an additional perspective.

5. Detailed Documentation:

   • Document the decision-making process for each step and the justification for why it is or is not a CCP.
   • Maintain records supporting the decisions made.

• Practical Example: Identification of CCPs in Juice Production:

  1. Juice Extraction:

     • Evaluation: Can extraction introduce or increase hazards? Not a CCP if hygiene is properly managed.

  2. Pasteurization:

     • Evaluation: Can the biological hazard (harmful microorganisms) be controlled at this step? Yes, it is a critical control point (CCP).

  3. Aseptic Packaging:

     • Evaluation: Can packaging reintroduce contaminants? If not done under aseptic conditions, it can be a CCP.

This structured approach ensures that CCPs are effectively identified, which are crucial for ensuring food safety in the production process.

Principle 3: Establish Critical Limits

Define maximum or minimum criteria (such as temperature, time, pH) that ensure the control of the Critical Control Point (CCP). Critical limits are specific values that must be achieved to ensure a CCP is effective in controlling identified hazards.

Methodology for Establishing Critical Limits:

1. Review of Guidelines and Regulations:

   • Consult normative sources and scientific guides to determine evidence-based limits.
   • Consider local and international regulations relevant to the product and process.

2. Scientific and Technical Analysis:

   • Use scientific and technical data, such as toxicology, microbiology, and thermal process studies, to substantiate the limits.
   • Conduct experimental testing if necessary to establish specific process limits.

3. Process and Product Evaluation:

   • Analyze product characteristics (such as composition, pH, water activity) that influence the growth or survival of hazards.
   • Evaluate the process to determine at which points hazards can be effectively controlled.

4. Consultation with Experts:

   • Include experts in food safety, microbiology, chemistry, and processes in defining limits.
   • Consider external advice for an additional perspective.

5. Documentation and Justification:

   • Document how the critical limits were determined and the scientific or technical justification behind them.
   • Maintain records that support the validity of the established limits.

Examples of Critical Limits:

Process	Hazard	Critical Limit	Justification
Juice Pasteurization	Pathogenic Microorganisms	Temperature ≥ 75°C for ≥ 15 seconds	Based on microbial reduction data.
Food Refrigeration	Bacterial Growth	Temperature ≤ 4°C	Controls the growth of pathogens like Listeria.
Meat Cooking	Pathogenic Bacteria (e.g., E. coli)	Internal Temperature ≥ 71°C for ≥ 3 minutes	Based on FDA guidelines to eliminate E. coli.
Pickle Acidification	Bacterial Growth	pH ≤ 4.6	Prevents the growth of bacteria like Clostridium botulinum.

• Practical Example: In juice pasteurization, a critical limit might be maintaining the juice at a temperature of 75°C for at least 15 seconds. This limit is based on the need to destroy pathogenic microorganisms like E. coli, which can be a hazard in unpasteurized juices.

Establishing well-founded and documented critical limits is essential to ensure the effectiveness of the HACCP plan and the safety of the food product.

Principle 4: Establish Monitoring Systems for CCPs

Implement procedures to monitor the Critical Control Points (CCPs) and ensure they stay within critical limits. Monitoring is essential for food safety management as it provides real-time data on hazard control.

Methodology for Establishing Monitoring Systems:

1. Identification of Parameters to Monitor:

   • Determine which parameters should be monitored at each CCP (e.g., temperature, time, pH).
   • Select parameters based on their ability to effectively control the hazard at the CCP.

2. Selection of Monitoring Methods and Equipment:

   • Choose appropriate monitoring methods and equipment for the selected parameters.
   • Consider accuracy, reliability, and the ability to provide continuous or frequent records.

3. Establishment of Monitoring Frequency:

   • Define the frequency at which monitoring should be carried out, based on the nature of the process and hazard.
   • In some cases, continuous monitoring may be necessary, while in others, periodic monitoring may suffice.

4. Assignment of Responsibilities:

   • Assign specific personnel for conducting monitoring, ensuring they are properly trained.
   • Establish clear procedures on what to do in case of a deviation.

5. Documentation and Record Keeping:

   • Keep detailed records of monitoring results and actions taken.
   • These records are essential for the verification and validation of the HACCP system.

Examples of Monitoring Systems:

CCP	Parameter to Monitor	Method/Equipment	Frequency	Responsible
Juice Pasteurization	Temperature	Digital Thermometers	Continuous	Machine Operator
Food Refrigeration	Temperature	Temperature Logs	Every 2 hours	Maintenance Staff
Meat Cooking	Internal Temperature	Probe Thermometers	Each batch	Chef/Cook
Pickle Acidification	pH	pH Meters	Each batch	Laboratory Technician

• Practical Example: In juice pasteurization, a monitoring system might involve installing digital thermometers to continuously record the temperature. This ensures the juice is maintained at 75°C for at least 15 seconds, effectively controlling microbiological hazards.

Establishing an effective and reliable monitoring system is key to ensuring that CCPs are adequately controlled and the food product is safe.

Principle 5: Establish Corrective Actions

Define actions to take when monitoring indicates that a Critical Control Point (CCP) is not under control. Corrective actions are essential to manage deviations as soon as they are detected and to prevent the release of unsafe food products.

Methodology for Establishing Corrective Actions:

1. Identification of Possible Deviations:

   • Anticipate possible deviations that may occur at each CCP.
   • Base forecasts on past experiences, process data, and technical knowledge.

2. Development of Specific Corrective Actions:

   • Define specific actions for each type of deviation identified at a CCP.
   • These actions can include process adjustments, reprocessing, or product disposal.

3. Assignment of Responsibilities:

   • Determine who is responsible for implementing corrective actions in case of deviation.
   • Ensure responsible personnel have the authority and training necessary to act effectively.

4. Establishment of Follow-Up Procedures:

   • Develop procedures to verify that corrective actions are effective.
   • Include steps to prevent recurrence of the deviation.

5. Documentation and Record Keeping:

   • Keep detailed records of any deviations and corrective actions taken.
   • These records are crucial for the review and continuous improvement of the HACCP system.

Examples of Corrective Actions:

CCP	Deviation	Corrective Action	Responsible	Follow-Up Procedure
Juice Pasteurization	Temperature < 75°C	Repasteurize or discard the product	Machine Operator	Verify the efficiency of repasteurization
Food Refrigeration	Temperature > 4°C	Adjust refrigerator or move products to another cooler	Maintenance Staff	Check and record temperature every hour until stabilized
Meat Cooking	Internal Temperature < 71°C	Continue cooking until the temperature is reached	Chef/Cook	Verify temperature at various points of the batch
Pickle Acidification	pH > 4.6	Adjust acid/vinegar ratio	Laboratory Technician	Perform additional pH tests on the adjusted batch

• Practical Example: If during juice pasteurization, the temperature falls below 75°C, the corrective action might be to repasteurize the affected batch or discard it. This action depends on the risk assessment and feasibility of achieving safe and effective pasteurization.

Establishing well-defined and documented corrective actions is vital to ensure that any deviations in the process are effectively managed, thus protecting the safety and quality of the food product.

Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures

Apply methods, in addition to monitoring, to confirm that the HACCP system is functioning effectively. Verification ensures that the HACCP plan is working as expected and that the food products are safe.

Methodology for Establishing Verification Procedures:

1. HACCP Plan Review:

   • Conduct regular reviews of the HACCP plan to ensure it remains appropriate and effective.
   • Consider any changes in the process, ingredients, or regulatory requirements.

2. Audits and Internal Reviews:

   • Schedule and conduct regular internal audits.
   • These audits should assess both compliance with the HACCP plan and the effectiveness of its implementation.

3. Laboratory Analysis and Testing:

   • Use laboratory analysis and testing to validate critical aspects of the HACCP plan.
   • Include microbiological, chemical, or physical analyses as appropriate.

4. Direct Observation and Process Evaluation:

   • Perform direct observations of procedures on the production line.
   • Evaluate if operations are being carried out as described in the HACCP plan.

5. Training and Competence of Personnel:

   • Verify that personnel involved in HACCP implementation are adequately trained and competent.
   • Consider periodic evaluations and ongoing training.

6. Documentation and Record Keeping:

   • Maintain detailed records of all verification activities.
   • These records are essential for demonstrating compliance and identifying areas for improvement.

Examples of Verification Procedures:

CCP	Verification Method	Frequency	Responsible
Juice Pasteurization	Process audits and laboratory testing	Biannual	Quality Supervisor
Food Refrigeration	Review of temperature logs and equipment calibration	Monthly	Maintenance Staff
Meat Cooking	Direct observation and review of temperature records	Each production	Chef/Cook
Pickle Acidification	pH testing and process audits	Each batch	Laboratory Technician

• Practical Example: In juice pasteurization, verification procedures might include conducting regular audits to review pasteurization procedures and random laboratory tests to validate the effectiveness of pasteurization in terms of pathogen elimination.

Establishing robust and systematic verification procedures is crucial to ensure that the HACCP system is functioning correctly and that the food products are safe and meet quality standards.

Principle 7: Establish Record Keeping and Documentation Systems

Establishing and maintaining adequate records and documentation is crucial for the effective implementation of a HACCP plan. These documents provide evidence that the HACCP system is functioning correctly and allow for tracking and resolving potential food safety issues.

Minimum Documents Necessary for HACCP Verification:

Document Type	Description	Practical Example
Written HACCP Plan	Detailed document describing the HACCP plan, including CCPs, critical limits, corrective actions, etc.	Pasteurization plan for fruit juice.
Monitoring Records	Records of monitoring conducted at each CCP.	Pasteurization temperature logs.
Corrective Action Records	Documentation of actions taken when a deviation is identified.	Actions taken when pasteurization temperature falls below the critical limit.
Verification Records	Records demonstrating that the HACCP plan is regularly verified and reviewed.	Internal audits and laboratory test results.

Ideal Documents for More Effective HACCP Management:

Document Type	Description	Practical Example
Training Records	Documents showing that personnel have been trained in HACCP principles and in their specific roles.	HACCP training certificates for production line operators.
Detailed Hazard Analysis	Document describing each potential hazard identified and how it is controlled.	Detailed analysis of microbiological hazards in juice production.
HACCP Procedure Validation	Studies or tests proving that elements of the HACCP plan are scientifically sound.	Validation studies for pasteurization times and temperatures.
HACCP Plan Review and Update	Documents reflecting regular review and update of the HACCP plan.	Records of annual HACCP plan reviews.
External Audits	Reports from audits conducted by third parties for an objective review of the HACCP system.	Audit report from an external food safety agency.

Adequate documentation not only meets regulatory requirements but is also a vital tool for the continuous improvement of the HACCP system and for ensuring the production of safe foods.

Conclusion

Developing and implementing a HACCP plan is a detailed process requiring ongoing commitment. Integrating this system with good hygiene practices ensures the production of safe foods, meeting quality and food safety standards. By educating and implementing these practices, food industry businesses can assure their consumers' confidence and regulatory compliance.

Challenges in HACCP Plan Development

• Complexity of food processes.
• Identification and analysis of hazards.
• Commitment and training of staff.

Recommendations Before Starting

• Assessment of needs and resources.
• Consultation with experts.
• Initial training.

Commitments to Acquire

| Participants | Commitments

| | ------------ | ----------- | | Management | - Provide necessary resources. - Establish an organizational culture that values food safety. - Actively participate in the development and maintenance of the HACCP system. | | Employees | - Commit to ongoing training. - Participate in identifying and reporting problems. - Follow and contribute to the improvement of established procedures. |

By addressing these challenges, following the recommendations, and committing at the management and employee levels, organizations can develop a successful HACCP plan, enhancing the quality and safety of their products and reinforcing consumer trust.

tip

If you need assistance with the implementation of HACCP in your company and achieving these benefits, feel free to contact us. We are here to help you achieve the business success you seek.

Additional Resources

• 5 Key Points to Understand the HACCP System
• Differences Between HACCP, ISO 22000, and FSSC 22000
• 3 Food Safety and Food Security Systems